Blog

The Hidden Liability Gap in Private Aviation

Aviation Hero Image

A $10 million liability limit on an aircraft that needed $100 million minimum. It's more common than you'd think. 
PRMA Insights

The Hidden Liability Gap in Private Aviation

 

When a client takes delivery of a new aircraft, the excitement is usually the easy part. What most families, and many of their advisors, don't yet grasp is what comes next. They haven't just added an asset to their portfolio. They've taken on an entirely new layer of liability, regulation, and operational risk that standard planning was never built to cover.

Owning an aircraft isn't like owning a yacht or a classic car. It's in the air constantly, crossing jurisdictions, carrying passengers, and creating new liability every time it takes off. Aviation is also one of the most heavily regulated industries in the world, and very little of that regulatory overlap exists with the rest of a client's portfolio. For advisors used to real estate, collections, or other high-value assets, aircraft ownership is a different category of risk entirely.

“
An owner-flown piston aircraft might only carry $100,000 per passenger. Almost everyone driving a car has higher liability limits than that.
The liability gap between owner-flown and professionally-flown aircraft is larger, and more common, than most advisors realize.

The Gap Nobody Sees Coming

 

How an aircraft is flown changes everything about its liability profile. An owner-flown piston aircraft might carry as little as $1-2 million, often split with a $100,000 per-passenger sub-limit. An owner-flown jet raises that ceiling to roughly $5 million with strong pilot hours. A professionally flown aircraft with a dual crew, like a Gulfstream G650, can carry $200 to $750 million. The difference isn't the aircraft. It's who's flying it and how the policy is built around that.

Most families assume their personal umbrella fills in the rest. It doesn't. Personal umbrellas exclude aviation exposure, and so do most commercial umbrellas, which means the underlying aircraft policy has to carry the full weight of that risk on its own.

Four Things Advisors Should Review
  • Ownership structure, including any leases
  • Liability exposure relative to who is flying and who is on board
  • Operational oversight, from pilot warranties to safety ratings
  • How the aircraft fits into the client's overall wealth strategy

Alternative flight models don't close this gap either. Fractional ownership, chartering, and dry leasing all come with an assumption of coverage that isn't automatic. In one recent case, a client dry-leasing a 13-seat jet had a $10 million liability limit on a policy that needed a $100 million minimum. He had no idea, and neither did the person who arranged the lease.

Getting this right isn't about avoiding every risk. It's about eliminating the surprises, so the coverage is already there when the unexpected happens.

Continue Listening
Want the Full Breakdown?

Samantha Money, who leads the Aircraft Specialty Practice at the Baldwin Group, joins Risk Ready to unpack owner-flown vs. professionally-flown liability gaps, international flying requirements, and the questions to ask before a client signs anything.

Listen to the episode →

Comments

There have been no comments made on this article. Why not be the first and add your own comment using the form below.

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to members only. Please login now to submit a comment.